Amos EXtensions Compiled Question

Started by Amiten, June 09, 2013, 08:27:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Amiten

Hi Amos Fans,

I have a question that always I ask my self and never ask and also never try,

the question is:

If I install some Extension like AMCAF or other ones and use this News featured (commands) to the Original Amos the result Program I Can Compile without problems with  the Compiler 2.0 of Amos Profesional?. or not?

Thanks in advance

king of Regards
Amiten
AMIGA is a Style of Life

Amiten

Hello, no body knows that??     I see its totally die this website?   :-[

AMIGA is a Style of Life

Hungry Horace

Quote from: Amiten on June 11, 2013, 04:05:50 PM
Hello, no body knows that??     I see its totally die this website?   :-[

apologies - must have missed this.

This website is far from dead ... just sometimes the "amos people"  get busy!!

Yes, by integrating an extension into the Amos Pro 2.0 Interpretter, it is immediately picked up by the compiler - nothing extra needs to be done!


I would definitely recommend using a number of extensions like AMCAF as they improve AMOS greatly!
Quote from: KillerGorillabecause winuae is made of code and your amiga is made of stuff


bruceuncle

Thanks Hungry Horace.  As one of the (self-appointed) "AMOS People":

Quotethe question is:

If I install some Extension like AMCAF or other ones and use this News featured (commands) to the Original Amos the result Program I Can Compile without problems with  the Compiler 2.0 of Amos Profesional?. or not?

Thanks in advance
Yes
QuoteHello, no body knows that??     I see its totally die this website? 
No  ;D

We are a bit busy as we're coming to grips with fixing the bugs in AMOS Pro now we have the sources.  And some great work is being done on integrating AGA code into AMOS.

Note also that the AMOS compiler is notoriously buggy at times.  If your program compiles ok, then fantastic.  If it doesn't, then that's something we aim to fix.  But it will take time.

We're just a bit slow off the mark sometimes ...  ;)
Repeat after me ...  "The AMOS Pro architecture is complex but it is not complicated."

SamuraiCrow

Not only is the Amos Compiler buggy, it generates inefficient code.  Maybe somebody will figure out a way to compile Amos with a GCC backend or something someday.

Amiten

first say sorry for say the site its die I love Amos and I want this site still alive Forever...

only 2, 3 days dont get response I think maybe not activity...

But happy to hear all your comments and your help  ;D ;D

Thanks to all for the help,, so if I dont understand bad the compiler 2.0 get the new commands of AMCAF or TOME without problem , I hope so

King of regards
Amiten
AMIGA is a Style of Life

SamuraiCrow

The only reason an extension might not compile with AmosPro 2.0 is if it is an unregistered version of that extension.  Since AMCAF and TOME are freeware, they will definitely work with the compiler.

Lonewolf10

Quote from: SamuraiCrow on June 14, 2013, 09:21:33 AM
The only reason an extension might not compile with AmosPro 2.0 is if it is an unregistered version of that extension.  Since AMCAF and TOME are freeware, they will definitely work with the compiler.

Not entirely true.

Some released extensions (I have a few) do not have the correct end code. To put it clearly, the error/no error routines (or the pointers to them) are faulty, and can crash the compiler or can cause compiled programs to crash, despite the fact the code works in the editor.

If you think you have a faulty extension, just give me a buzz and I will see if I can correct it for you.